- Home
- How it works
How it works
The first nine months, one turn at a time.
You cannot install an AI-native law firm. You grow one out of a firm that is already working. The lawyers do their jobs, the model is wired into the work, and everything they ask for and everything they correct is kept. The automation is built from that record, a little more each month.
The flywheel
Start with the work. Then turn the wheel.
Nothing is replaced on day one. The firm keeps practicing law, and each turn of the wheel leaves a little less to do by hand.
- 01
The lawyers do their jobs
I start in the middle of a regular law firm, on real files. Nobody is let go and nothing is rebuilt first.
- 02
Claude is wired into the work
A lawyer types a request the way he would say it. Claude answers through the firm’s own forms, its best prior work and its rules. Follow one request.
- 03
All of it is kept
Every request, the draft that came back, what the lawyer changed and why. That history is the asset, and it belongs to the firm.
- 04
The repeat work is automated
Whatever the record shows the firm doing again and again gets a written procedure, the firm’s template and checks. Each correction becomes a standing rule. Then the wheel turns again.
The record
What gets kept, from the first day.
The record is the whole point. A model that has never seen your firm’s work writes like a stranger. One that reads the record writes like the firm.
- 01The requestWhat the lawyer asked for, in his own words.
- 02The draftWhat came back, and which prior work it was built from.
- 03The revisionWhat the lawyer changed before it went out.
- 04The reasonWhy he changed it, saved as a standing rule.
- 05The finalThe version that was signed, filed or sent.
The record is stored on the firm’s systems and belongs to the firm. Nothing in this setup trains a model on it. It is searched at the time of a request, and what Claude reads then goes to Anthropic under the firm’s own agreement.
Month by month
What happens, and when.
A typical first nine months. Each stage is a fixed fee quoted before it begins, and each one leaves the firm with something it keeps whether or not it goes on.
- Month 1
Wire it in
I spend two and a half days in your office. I read your forms and a sample of files, watch how work moves, and train your lawyers on their own kind of work.
Then I write the firm’s standing instructions and connect Claude to the forms, the files and the best prior work.
You keep: trained lawyers, a written roadmap, the standing instructions - Months 2–3
Keep the record
The lawyers use it on real files. Requests, drafts, revisions and corrections are saved as the work is done.
The two or three documents the firm drafts most get a written procedure, and the firm’s finished work is graded into a searchable library.
You keep: the record, the library, the first procedures - Months 4–6
Automate the repeat work
The record now shows what repeats. Those documents are built from the firm’s own templates by a forms program, so the caption and signature block are never typed by a model.
Checks refuse a draft with a missing fact. Each correction is read before the next draft.
You keep: the forms program, the checks, the saved corrections - Months 7–9
The wheel is turning
New work starts from what the firm has already done and already fixed. More procedures are added from what the record shows.
The firm’s past requests are replayed as tests, and the results are compared with the work its lawyers approved.
30 to 40 percent more productive
The honest number
Why 30 to 40 percent, and not 10x.
Because a lawyer has to read all of it. Reading does not get ten times faster, and in law it is the part that cannot be skipped.
What the setup takes off a lawyer’s desk is the first draft, the hunt for the last motion like this one, the caption and the certificate of service, the retyping of facts that are already in the file, and the correction he has made five times before.
What it leaves is the reading, the judgment and the client. That is most of what a lawyer is for, and it is why the gain is a third and not a multiple.
- Month nine: 30 to 40 percent. For a five-lawyer firm that is the output of six and a half to seven lawyers from the same five.
- With a much larger investment: perhaps 50 to 60 percent. More procedures, more of the firm’s history graded, more testing. The returns get smaller as you go.
- Quality goes up across the board. The firm’s best prior work leads every draft, the formatting stops drifting, and a correction made once stays made.
- Ten times: no. Not while a competent lawyer reads every page, and I will not build a setup in which one does not.
These figures are my estimates. They are not a guarantee, and a firm whose work repeats less will see less.
What is never automated
Three things stay with the lawyer.
You can’t play around with law. Everything that leaves the office has been read by a competent human who answers for it.
- DecisionsWhat to plead, what to concede, when to settle and what to tell the court. The setup drafts. It does not decide.
- AccountabilityThe lawyer who signs is responsible for every word and every citation. A finished build is not approval, and nothing here files, serves or sends anything to anyone but the lawyer.
- RelationshipsClients hire a person. The time the setup gives back is best spent with them.
Why not just buy it
What goes wrong with AI in a box.
A firm built from software first, with lawyers added later, has no record to work from. It has never been corrected by the people who will sign its work.
| Question | AI in a box | Built inside the firm |
|---|---|---|
| Where it starts | With a product, before a lawyer has used it on a real file. | In the middle of a working practice, on real files. |
| What it knows | General law, and whatever someone pastes in. | The firm’s forms, its best prior work and every correction its lawyers have made. |
| How it improves | When the vendor ships a new version. | Every week, from the firm’s own record. |
| The people | Replaced at the start. | Kept. What changes is how they spend the day. |
| Review | A cost to be removed. | Every page is read by a lawyer. That part is never automated. |
| The promise | Ten times the output. | 30 to 40 percent by month nine, and better work. |
Plain answers
What firms ask about the nine months.
Do we have to stop or slow down to do this?
No. The work continues the whole time, and it has to. The setup is built from the work your lawyers are doing, so there is nothing to build from if they stop.
Can it go faster than nine months?
The first drafts come early. The larger gain takes time because it depends on the record, and the record only grows as fast as the firm works. A firm with a high volume of one kind of document gets there sooner.
What if our lawyers do not use it?
Then nothing happens. The wheel is turned by lawyers asking for work and correcting what comes back. That is why month one is training on your own files and not a software rollout.
Will we need fewer people?
That is your decision, and it is not what this is built for. Most firms have more work than time. The same people get more of it done, and done better.
Do we have to change our software?
Usually not. The setup works with your document folders, your Word templates and your e-mail. Often the Claude subscription you already pay for can run it.
What does it cost?
Month one is the on-site assessment and training, $15,000 for two and a half days, plus travel at cost. Everything after is quoted as a fixed fee before the work begins. See the schedule of fees.
Has anyone actually done this?
I have, in my own law practice, where every piece described here runs today. On November 10, 2026 it had 94 written procedures, 23 style guides, more than 350 saved corrections and 1,056 document builds recorded since August 2026.
Next step
Start with month one.
Tell me what your firm drafts most and how it produces it today. I will tell you what the first turn of the wheel would look like. Fees and how it starts.
nick@proprietarylegal.com